Does the issue really belong here?
- I definitively want to report a bug within deCONZ or its REST-API
Is there already an existing issue for this?
- I have searched the existing issues and there is none for the bug at hand
Describe the bug
I have 3 Vimar window covering devices paired to Conbee II.
Until today they worked OK.
Today one of them didn’t respond to OPEN commands even if sometimes the circle was blinking blue.
I resetted by F5 and now I have:
![image](https://forum.phoscon.de/uploads/default/original/2X/c/c66d2da355806e2011117af5afbfdc935701eb07.png)
Normally it’s:
![image](https://forum.phoscon.de/uploads/default/original/2X/d/dd0f522305927a4245c728254b0f85f7d5ff0acc.png)
Steps to reproduce the behavior
Press F5 and wait
Expected behavior
I expect device working as usual
Screenshots
No response
Environment
- Host system: Raspberry Pi 3b
- Running method: Raspbian
- Firmware version: 0x26780700
- deCONZ version (not Home assistant Addon version!): v2.26.2-beta
- Device: ConBee II
- Do you use an USB extension cable: yes
- Is there any other USB or serial devices connected to the host system? NO
Smanar commented
For me it’s an inclusion problem.
Your device is not full included (the 0xffff), try to re-include it, without delting it.
LeoeLeoeL commented
There is no way to fix that manually.
Even resetting the device from the device (very very annoying method). I also paired the device to Zigbee2Mqtt (using another coordinator) and then paired again to Deconz.
Same picture as above.
I had something similar few week ago.
Deconz fixed that after 4 or 5 days. The difference was that last time the device didn’t work until deconz fixed it.
After few hours Deconz fixed a little bit:
![image](https://forum.phoscon.de/uploads/default/original/2X/a/a57f9d7351f13a21eb8d28bf0eb87beecae283b1.png)
Is that normal?
What happened in these hours?
It have just retry, and retry and retry again, up the device finaly send the missing data.
You can help deconz to do that too Xiaomi: Lost devices or functional issues · dresden-elektronik/deconz-rest-plugin Wiki · GitHub
(the procedure is a little different, deconz have evolued since, but the procedure is same, except you don’t need to awake the device for a covering, not a sensor)
After Read simple descriptors the list became complete again:
.
But this is a workaround.
Why deconz do have this kind of problems when pairing?
It can come from the device too, deconz ask for information at every inclusion, the device is free to answer or not, can be connexion issue. But i don’t say it can’t be from deconz.
You have 3 coverings, if only one have issues, can be the guilty.
This issue happen generaly on sensor, less talkative and sleepers, realy rare on routers.