Hello,
Following the update of the gateway in version 2.29.0, I have two LEGRAND devices that have different information.
This concerns Legrand wireless Remote switch 0 677 23
These are the only devices that do not have a DDF
the raw information is completely different.
“modelid”: “Remote switch”,
VS
“modelid”: “Remote switch”, & “modelid”: “PHOSCON_FSM_FLAG”, 
The good news is that everything works correctly.
But it is still strange
Hello, there is a mistake.
Device id=35 and id = 42 are a real device.
Device id = 82 and id = 83 are virtual device, created by phoscon.
On my side I don’t use Phoscon so I don’t have them, and Jeedom too don’t create them, only Phoscon for it’s “magic”
And yes, thoses device are old, so still managed by legacy code, no DDF.
Bonjour,
Justement, Jeedom à créé un équipement CLIP-Sensor PUSHDIM-TOOGLE
{
"83": {
"config": {
"on": true,
"reachable": true
},
"etag": "7fc8e32b1e05fff8e1e9b83818b43e8d",
"manufacturername": "Phoscon",
"modelid": "PHOSCON_FSM_FLAG",
"name": "CLIP-Sensor PUSHDIM-TOOGLE",
"state": {
"flag": false,
"lastupdated": "2024-10-18T16:14:16.191"
},
"swversion": "1.0",
"type": "CLIPGenericFlag",
"uniqueid": "00:04:74:00:00:c5:41:02-01-0006-pushdim-toogle-58-Sun Apr 02 2023 15:32:03 GMT+0200 (heure d\u2019\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019Europe centrale)"
}
}
J’ai supprimé l’équipement Legrand de Phoscon et dans Deconz.
J’ai réinitialisé l’équipement Legrand et fait une inclusion avec Phoscon.
L’équipement est maintenant reconnu correctement.
I don’t think this device is from Jeedom, I have never see this plugin creating this kind of entry, but Phsocon create a lot.
And I don’t know how to delete them without using the API, hoping for Phoscon don’t forget it.
If you have jeedom, better to don’t use Phoscon, except for “take a look” or enable the pairing. Jeedom is more advanced and more controllable